治療用藥不包括丹木斯(可使用丹木斯但是不應作為唯一治療方式)
.
HIGH ALTITUDE CEREBRAL EDEMA (HACE) 2004 高海拔腦水腫
INTRODUCTION
近期內有高度上升. 通常發生於 急性高山病AMS 或 高海拔肺水腫 HAPE 之後, 主要特徵是意識改變. 可能進展至 昏迷. 精神錯亂. 神智混亂. 以及步態不穩(運動失調). HACE 雖不常見但死亡率高. 有時在非常健康的人也會造成死亡. 多數專家認為 HACE 是由 AMS 進展而來. 所以無法精確區分嚴重AMS 與 HACE. 臨床上 . HACE 是腦部病變, 而 AMS 不是. 這篇回顧文章是這 20 年(1983-2004)以來第一篇針對 HACE的專題文章.
is a mysterious and infrequent malady brought about by exposure to the thin air of high altitude. We define it as a condition occurring in persons who have recently arrived at high altitude, usually secondary to acute mountain sickness or high altitude pulmonary edema, and marked by disturbances of consciousness that may progress to deep coma, psychiatric changes of varying degree, confusion, and ataxia of gait. Although uncommon, HACE causes significant morbidity and occasionally death in otherwise perfectly healthy people. Most experts consider HACE, both clinically and pathophysiologically, an extension of acute mountain sickness (AMS); the distinction between HACE and advanced AMS is therefore inherently imprecise. Clinically, HACE is an encephalopathy, while AMS is not. In this brief paper we review clinical aspects of HACE and discuss current concepts of pathophysiology and treatment. In contrast to many recent reviews on acute mountain sickness or altitude illness in general, this is the first specific review of HACE in 20 years (Dickinson, 1983).
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS 流行病學及危險因子.
HACE 發生於尚未高度適應的人, 上升到海拔 2000 公尺, 多數是突然上升到海拔 3000 公尺. 最低海拔的案例報告是 海拔 2100 公尺 (1979 年Dickinson 醫師). 經過高度適應的攀登者也曾有案例報告發生在超過 7000 公尺海拔. 因臨床定義與診斷不同. 流行病學的資料缺乏, 以及上升速率差異極大. HACE 實際發生率並不明.
HACE occurs in unacclimatized persons at altitudes above 2000 m and most commonly with abrupt ascent to over 3000 m. The lowest reported altitude of occurrence is 2100 m (Dickinson, 1979). Less commonly, it also occurs at extreme altitude (over 7000 m) in climbers apparently well acclimatized (Clarke, 1988). Due to differences in definition and clinical diagnosis, limited epidemiological research, and wide range of rate of ascent, the exact incidence of HACE is not clear.
Hackett and Rennie (1976) 報告在尼泊爾地區 4243至5500 公尺的健行者發生率約 1%. 但如果病患有 AMS. 則罹患 HACE 機率變成 3%.
Hackett and Rennie (1976) reported HACE in 1.0% of all trekkers between 4243 and 5500 m in Nepal, but HACE increased to 3.4% in those who suffered AMS.
Bärtsch提到, Tianyi Wu 對他報告, 在海拔 4555 公尺的西藏, 5355名遊客中, 發生率 0.5%.
Bärtsch mentioned an incidence of 0.5% in 5355 visitors to 4555 m in Tibet, as reported to him by Tianyi Wu (Bartsch and Roach, 2001).
Basnyat 用問卷調查方式, 報告尼泊爾的吠陀朝聖者在 4300 公尺海拔的 HACE 高達驚人的 31%. 這遠比其他研究的數據更高. 但這是在最不尋常的上升情況, 多數人並不ˊ會在兩天內從 2000公尺爬升到 4300 公尺過夜.
Basnyat et al. (2000), using a questionnaire, reported the astonishing figure of 31% of Vedic pilgrims in Nepal with HACE at 4300 m. This is a far higher incidence than any other study, but it was in the setting of a most unusual ascent profile; rarely do so many persons ascend in two days from 2000 to 4300 m to sleep at that altitude.
Nonetheless, a more comprehensive study including neurological exam is necessary to verify these findings.
在發生高海拔肺水腫 HAPE 病患更容易發生 HACE, Gabry 報告在 52 名法國阿爾卑斯 HAPE 病患, 13% 有感覺遲鈍(木僵)或昏迷.
HACE is much more likely in those with high altitude pulmonary edema. Gabry et al. (2003) found that 13% of 52 patients with HAPE in the French Alps had stupor or coma.
Hultgren 報告在科羅拉多洛磯山脈 150 位 HAPE 患者 其中 14% 罹患 HACE. 在瑞士阿爾卑斯山由直升機救援脫困的 HAPE 患者有 20% 罹患 HACE.
Hultgren et al. (1996) reported that 14% of 150 patients with HAPE in the Colorado Rockies had HACE, and 20% of 50 HAPE patients evacuated by helicopter in the Swiss Alps also had HACE (Hochstrasser et al., 1986).
在一篇解剖的研究發現因 HAPE 死亡的患者有 50% 有 HACE 的病理發現. 反過來說, HAPE 在確診為 HACE 的患者也常見. 在一篇科羅拉多洛磯山脈的研究, 13位因 HACE 住院的病患其中 11 名合併 HAPE.
Autopsy studies reveal that 50% of those dying with HAPE also had HACE. Conversely, HAPE is common in those identified with HACE. In a series from the Colorado Rocky Mountains, 11 of 13 patients admitted to hospital with HACE had HAPE (Yarnell et al., 2000).
雖然 HACE 實際發生率不明. HACE 比 HAPE 少很多. 除了在一項研究. 且比 AMS 手更多. 是否所有 HACE 病患都先罹患 AMS 並不明. 但多數是這樣. 但偶而會有突發性 HACE 的案例報告. 尤其是在極端高海拔. 是否這反映了缺乏對前期症狀的辨識. 或是因為病情發展太快速仍不明. 這種表現特別危險. 由 AMS 進展成為 HACE 的速率各異, 偶而會在數小時內發生. 在一篇回顧文件發生 HACE 的平均海拔是 4730 公尺. 但如果合併 HAPE 發病海拔會更低 3920 公尺.
Although the exact incidence of HACE is unclear, it is less common than HAPE, except in one study (Basnyat et al., 2000) and much less common than AMS. Whether all patients with HACE develop AMS first is unclear; certainly, that is the usual case. However, abrupt onset of HACE is occasionally reported, especially at extreme altitude. Whether this reflects a lack of early recognition of prodromal symptoms or rapid onset de novo is not clear; this presentation is particularly dangerous (Clarke, 1988); see the case examples at the end of this paper. The speed of progression from AMS to HACE varies. Most commonly, HACE develops as a progression of AMS over 24 to 36 h, either independently of HAPE or as HAPE develops concomitantly. Occasionally, AMS progresses to HACE within a few hours. The mean altitude of onset of HACE in one literature review was 4730 m, but was lower (3920 m) when associated with HAPE (Hultgren, 1997).
既然 HACE 是 AMS 的延伸, 也常與 HAPE 併發, 發生 HACE 的危險因子與 AMS/HAPE 相同. 包括
1. 快速上升至高海拔
2. 運動
3. 過去曾發生高海拔疾病 HAI
4. 基因可能有相關
5. 對於 HAPE 則與先前曾有的肺部循環異常有關
Since HACE is apparently an extension of AMS and also occurs commonly with HAPE, the risk factors for HACE are the same as those for AMS and HAPE (see the reviews by Bärtsch and Schoene in this issue). These include a rapid ascent to altitude, exertion, a past history of high altitude illness, perhaps a genetic predisposition, and, for HAPE, certain preexisting abnormalities of the pulmonary circulation.
在 Basnyat 研究中的高 HACE 是因為快速上升導致, 68%有 AMS,. 年齡與性別的影響不大. 兒童的HACE案例很罕見. 可能與兒童進行快速上升到高海拔的人數不多有關.
For example, the high incidence of HACE in the Basnyat study was attributed to the rapid rate of ascent: 68% developed AMS by the Lake Louise criteria (Basnyat et al., 2000). Data regarding the influence of age and gender are scant. Reports of HACE in children are rare, perhaps reflecting the small population of children making rapid ascent to high altitude.
與 HAPE 不同. 目前並沒有已經發現的生理異常與 HACE 或 AMS 有相關. 除了顱內佔位性顱內腫塊或囊腫. 有人表示隨機性解剖異常或許可解釋AMS與HACE的趨勢. 與 HAPE 不同的是. 目前沒有人觀察到可能的基因前置因子, 例如 血管內皮生長因子 VEGF 多態性, 或與腦部循環對低氧反應的基因.
Unlike HAPE, no preexisting physiological abnormalities have yet been identified as risk factors for AMS or HACE, except perhaps space-occupying intracranial masses or cysts (Hackett, 2000). Some have suggested that random anatomical differences might explain a tendency to AMS and HACE (Ross, 1985); see the section later on pathophysiology. Unlike HAPE, no one has yet investigated possible genetic predisposing factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphisms or the genetics of the cerebral circulatory response to hypoxia (see pathophysiology).
CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND DIAGNOSIS 臨床表現與診斷
神智改變與步態失調代表 HACE 發作. 典型的狀況, 在前 24-48 小時先有AMS 症狀. 通常都會頭痛但並非絕對. 嗜睡及輕微心理變化最先出現. 病患通常退縮和冷淡. 由明顯懶散變成疲乏, 進而完全無法照料自己. 例如, 無法讓自己好好的穿上衣服, 不關心吃喝, 睡在睡袋外, 混亂變的明顯, 通常與運動失調串聯, 幾乎都會食慾不振. 噁心很常見., 嘔吐不常見, 很少會有癲癇, 有一篇研究作者提到, 如果病患在高海拔看起來像是稍微喝醉,他們應該是腦水腫了(Clarke, 1988). 事實上. 輕微運動失調及感覺遲鈍應該提高對 HACE 的懷疑. 在一篇研究. 44位病患有 16 位昏迷. 但有 13 位病患的神智被描述是正常的(Dickinson, 1981). 在另一篇研究有 20 位病患, 其中 12 位昏迷(Norboo et al., 1998), 這些研究的昏迷比例這麼高可能是因為送達醫院的時間過久且下降時間延遲.
Change in consciousness and ataxic gait herald the onset of HACE. Typically, symptoms of AMS have been progressing over the previous 24 to 48 h. Headache is often but not always present. Drowsiness and subtle psychological changes appear first. The victim is often withdrawn and apathetic. Lassitude progresses from apparent laziness to being completely unable to care for oneself, for example, not caring to dress appropriately for the conditions, not bothering to eat or drink, and sleeping outside a sleeping bag. Confusion becomes evident, usually in tandem with ataxia. Anorexia is nearly always present, while nausea is common and vomiting is less common (Dickinson, 1983). Case reports have mentioned both auditory and visual hallucinations, but these are uncommon (Oelz and Largiader, 1987). Seizures appear to be rare. One author has suggested, “If the patient seems mildly drunk at altitude they have cerebral edema” (Clarke, 1988). Indeed, mild ataxia and dulled sensorium should certainly raise the suspicion of HACE. Coma was present in 16 of 44 patients in one series, while consciousness was described as normal in 13 of the 44 (Dickinson, 1981). In another series of 20 patients from Ladakh, 12 were in coma (Norboo et al., 1998). The high incidence of coma in these series is due in part to prolonged transport to hospital and to achieve descent.
理學檢查變異極大. 神智混論. 運動失調是最常見的. 在 (Dickinson, 1983) 這篇研究. HACE 病患有 59% 發生視網膜出血. 但病情最嚴重的沒有視網膜出血. 視網膜出血在海拔 5000 公尺以上很常見, 不一定與高海拔疾病有關係, 有出現視網膜出血不能用來診斷 HACE. 其他人建議應該仔細檢查眼底. 可以看到高海拔造成的視網膜病變進展, 代表即將發展成 HACE.
Physical findings are variable, with disturbed consciousness and ataxia being the most common. Table 1 lists the neurological findings in the largest series published to date (Dickinson, 1983). In this same series, retinal hemorrhages were present in 59% of those with HACE, but the most seriously ill did not have hemorrhages. Since retinal hemorrhages are common at altitudes over 5000 m and not necessarily associated with altitude illness, their presence is not diagnostic of HACE (Hackett and Roach, 2001a). Others have suggested, however, that careful funduscopy revealing a progression of retinal pathology at altitude is an indication of impending HACE (Wiedman and Tabin, 1999).
很多其他狀況會與 HACE 搞混. TABLE 2. 在穩定的海拔待三天之後發病, 突發性, 創傷, 局部神經功能異常, 高燒, 頸部僵硬, 治療無效等等, 應考慮其他診斷.
Many other conditions are easily confused with HACE (see Table 2). Onset of illness after 3 days at a stable altitude, abrupt onset, trauma, focal neurological signs, high fever, stiff neck, and lack of response to treatment should all mandate consideration of other diagnoses. \
舉例, 去年 2003年在 麥肯尼山有個攀登者被診斷是 HACE. 給予類固醇.氧氣.下降治療無反應, 最後發現是胰島素分泌腫瘤造成的低血糖. 本文其中一位作者最近被會診五個在科羅拉多診斷HACE的案例最後診斷是嚴重低血鈉. 其中一人死亡.
For example, this past summer, a climber on Denali was diagnosed with HACE; did not respond well to steroids, oxygen, and descent; and was later found to have episodic hypoglycemia from an insulin-secreting tumor. One of the authors (PH) has recently consulted on five patients diagnosed with HACE in Colorado who turned out instead to have severe hyponatremia; one died.
也是在科羅拉多. 一個大型的醫療事故是因為誤診為HACE的男性最後是泡疹性腦炎. 臨床醫師要小心詢問病史及理學檢查. 安排適當檢驗. 排除其他可能狀況. 除了輕微HACE快速完全恢復以外, HACE 病患應該住院, 接受完整評估, 包括抽血檢查. MRI. 腰椎穿刺. 因為 HACE 與 HAPE 關聯性. 應該照 CXR. 如果HACE 的病患氧氣濃度低. 代表可能同時罹患 HAPE. 在嚴重需住院的 13位 HACE 病患, 其中 11 名同時合併 HAPE.
Also in Colorado, a large malpractice settlement resulted from an incorrect diagnosis of HACE in a man subsequently diagnosed with herpes encephalitis. The clinician must be careful to do a complete history and physical exam, with appropriate laboratory studies to rule out other conditions when feasible. Except in mild cases with rapid, complete recovery, patients with HACE should probably be hospitalized and receive a complete evaluation, including measurements of serum electrolytes and renal function, an MRI, and usually a lumbar puncture with appropriate CSF studies to rule out infection. Because of the association of HACE and HAPE, a chest radiograph should be obtained. In the field, abnormally low oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry in someone with HACE is sufficient evidence for the presumption of HAPE. In patients severely ill and requiring hospitalization, 11 of 13 in one series had concomitant HAPE (Yarnell et al., 2000).
影像檢查可能有助於診斷. 但並非一定必要.
Imaging studies may be helpful for diagnosis, but are not always necessary.
CT images demonstrate attenuation of signal, either diffusely or in the white matter, with compression of sulci and flattening of gyri.
MRI is more valuable both to identify the characteristic findings to confirm HACE and to exclude other pathology. T-2 and especially diffusion-weighted MR imaging reveals increased signal in the white matter, particularly in the splenium of the corpus callosum (see Fig. 1). While this finding is not pathognomonic, in the setting of recent ascent to altitude, it can be considered confirmatory. Since the MR findings may lag behind clinical recovery, MRI may be useful for diagnosis even after clinical improvement. In the only series of consecutive HACE patients studied with MRI, 7 of 9 patients with clinical HACE demonstrated the typical T-2 findings (Hackett et al., 1998). A subsequent patient of these investigators with a negative standard MRI demonstrated increased signal on diffusion-weighted MRI, raising the possibility that the two patients with negative MRI in their initial series (Hackett et al., 1998) may have had a positive MRI if diffusion-weighted imaging had been employed. Flair sequences, apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, and other newer MR techniques may further improve the diagnostic utility of MRI for HACE (Wieshmann et al., 1996; Wieshmann et al., 1999; Lansberg et al., 2000; Hergan et al., 2002; Provenzale et al., 2002; Dong et al., 2004)
有時須做腰椎穿刺以排除感染或 SAH. 初始壓力通常會高. 之前報告說數值 44-220 mmH2O (正常在 200 mmH2O以下) 最後檢查通常是正常. 有一例出現淋巴球. 有個新的 MRI 技術可以估算腦壓. 無實驗數據能確診 HACE. 雖然可以排除其他疾病. 周邊WBC可能正常會高.
Lumbar puncture is sometimes necessary to exclude infection or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Opening pressure will usually be high; values
from 44 to 220 mmH2O have been reported (Singh et al., 1969; Houston and Dickinson, 1975). Fluid analysis is most often completely normal; lymphocytes were reported in one case. A new MRI technique for estimating intracranial pressure promises a noninvasive measurement
useful to both researchers and clinicians (Alperin et al., 2000). No laboratory studies are useful for confirming HACE, although they
may exclude other diagnoses. The peripheral blood white cell count may be normal or high (Dickinson, 1981).
THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES LEADING TO HACE 高海拔腦水腫病理生理進展
高海拔的腦水腫與嚴重神經功能異常在 1898 年由 Mosso 提出. 由 Singh 在 1965 年經解剖兩位死於HACE的士兵屍體確認, 從此反覆被觀察到. 之後, 曾有幾個互相競爭的理論被提出解釋這種病理變化, 目前主流理論是血管性腦水腫,
The link between cerebral edema and severe neurological dysfunction at high altitude was proposed by Mosso in 1898, first confirmed by Singh in 1965 from autopsy of two soldiers who died of HACE, and has been repeatedly observed since. Subsequently, several competing theories have evolved to explain the pathophysiology. At present, the leading theory is that HACE is a vasogenic edema; that is, a disruption of the blood–brain barrier, as discussed later. How AMS relates to HACE is still a matter of much speculation. In this review we identify the major gaps in our knowledge of the
pathophysiology of HACE, and also in the spectrum of changes from AMS to HACE, and propose several unique approaches to advance our understanding in each area.
PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN HACE 病理發現
腰椎穿刺會發現HACE個案的腦壓上升,. 通常大於 200 mmH2O. 電腦斷層與核磁共振顯示腦水腫. 驗屍發現全腦水腫, 末期疾病的解剖發現包括小點狀出血. 靜脈竇栓塞. 及其他栓塞. 血栓形成在 HACE 痊癒的患者腦部掃描不會出現. 對於腦水腫成因的洞察來自於最近HACE病患核磁共振影像的發現, 腦白質胼胝體水腫. 灰質沒有水腫. 所以作者提出血管性水腫假設. 其他支持血管性水腫的機轉包括大腦上皮細胞因缺氧導致的通透性上升. 細胞性毒性水腫可能並存的的可能性也要考慮. 我們假設任何解釋 HACE 病理機轉的模型, 第一步應該是血管性水腫
Lumbar punctures have revealed elevated CSF pressures in HACE, often more than 200 mmH2O. CT scans and MRI have shown cerebral
edema (Matsuzawa et al., 1992; Hackett et al., 1998), and necropsies have documented gross cerebral edema (Singh et al., 1969; Dickinson,
1983). End-stage findings from autopsy reports include small petechial hemorrhages, venous sinus thromboses, and other thromboses
(Dickinson, 1983). Thrombosis is absent on brain scans in recovering HACE cases, confirming thrombosis as a terminal event. Thus,
the pathophysiology of HACE includes brain edema and raised intracranial pressure. Insights into the cause of the cerebral edema
come from a recent series of MR imaging studiesstudies in HACE patients revealing edema in the white matter corpus callosum, with no gray
matter edema, leading the authors to propose a vasogenic origin for the edema (Hackett et al., 1998). Other evidence supporting a vasogenic
mechanism includes the time course of both onset and resolution, the fact that patients recover completely, response to steroids, and tissue and
cell experiments showing increased permeability of cerebral endothelium exposed to hypoxia. The possibility must be considered that cytotoxic
edema may coexist with vasogenic edema in the pathogenesis of HACE. Definitive imaging studies to distinguish cytotoxic from vasogenic
edema during HACE and its resolution will be necessary to answer this question. However, we propose that any model to explain the
pathophysiology of HACE must in the first instance account for vasogenic edema.
MECHANISMS ACCOUNTING FOR VASOGENIC EDEMA 血管性水腫機轉
解釋血管性水腫的可能機轉包括導致 BBB 破壞的機械性因子, BBB通透性的生化媒介物或兩者都是.
Potential mechanisms to explain vasogenic edema include mechanical factors leading to blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, biochemical mediators of BBB permeability, or both. These concepts are summarized briefly here, with inclusion of several new and potentially revealing approaches. More detailed reviews are available elsewhere (Krasney, 1994; Hackett, 1999; Hossmann, 1999; Hackett and Roach, 2001b; Roach and Hackett, 2001;
Pardridge, 2003).
血管性水腫會可由大腦微血管高壓導致. 例如高血壓腦病變的例子. 及姙娠毒血症, 這些可逆狀態.
Vasogenic edema can result from cerebral capillary hypertension, as for example in hypertensive encephalopathy and toxemia of
pregnancy. These reversible conditions, associated with increased white matter T2 signal, are associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation.
At high altitude, there is mixed evidence for impaired autoregulation (Levine et al., 1999; Jansen et al., 2000; Ter Minassian et al., 2001).
Further studies of autoregulation in persons at altitude, including those developing AMS as well as healthy subjects and high-altitude natives,
will help to clarify this issue. Cerebral capillary hypertension may also result from any impairment of cerebral venous return, especially during hypoxia-induced cerebral vasodilatation. HAPE may be a case in point, because of increased intrathoracic pressure. For example, Oelz (1983) invoked a change
in venous pressure to explain the onset of HACE with coma after he treated his mild altitude pulmonary edema with a PEEP mask set
to 10 cmH2O. Random anatomical differences may also play a role in capillary hypertension. Recently, an anatomical abnormality leading to
restriction of venous outflow was suggested as a predisposing factor to elevated ICP in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (Farb et al., 2003). Such an abnormality could also contribute to HACE and could help to explain the random individual susceptibility. Studies of cerebral venous anatomy and pressure in volunteers with AMS might be revealing.
Chemical mediators of permeability could by themselves cause vasogenic edema. Alternatively, in the presence of elevated cerebral capillary pressure, a small chemically mediated leak could have profound effects on brain edema. The interplay of mechanical and chemical mediators of BBB leak in vasogenic edema await further investigation. The same question of mechanical versus chemical permeability in the pulmonary circulation in HAPE has been answered in favor of mechanical factors. For HACE, these investigations are handicapped by the absence of a good animal model and the difficulty of assessing cerebral capillary pressure and brain biochemical processes in the intact human at altitude.
The list of potential chemical mediators of BBB leak in cerebral edema includes bradykinin, histamine, arachidonic acid, oxygen and hydroxyl free radicals, and perhaps iNOSgenerated nitric oxide. Two other mechanisms remain very interesting and perhaps more amenable to study in human volunteers. First, Raichle et al. (1978) reported increased BBB permeability in an animal study secondary to stimulation of central noradrenergic output.
Marked elevation of sympathetic outflow by hypoxia is well documented (see Reeves, 1993, for a review), and individual variation in the degree of sympathetic stimulation could play a role in BBB leak. Second, a role for vascular endothelial growth factor to explain elevated vascular
permeability leading to vasogenic edema was first proposed by Severinghaus (1995).
Schoch and co-workers (2002) recently demonstrated two important findings in mice. First, hypoxia induced VEGF expression, and blocking
that expression with a VEGF-specific antibody prevented vascular leakage in the brain. Second, dexamethasone appeared to prevent and reverse hypoxia-induced brain edema by blocking VEGF expression. These two findings suggest a VEGF-related mechanism at play in HACE. If true, then studying the genetics of VEGF in individuals might offer clues to HACE susceptibility.
THE LINK FROM AMS TO HACE 由高山病變成高海拔腦水腫的連結
The clinical progression from the mild symptoms of AMS to severe, incapacitating 致殘 headache and mild ataxia and on to HACE suggests a reasonable and testable link in the pathophysiology of AMS and HACE. One view holds that the cerebral edema seen in HACE begins already in mild AMS, causing high-altitude headache through a mechanical, swellinginduced stretching of pain-sensitive structures, such as the dura or meninges. Another view is
that cerebral vasodilatation, rather than edema, leads to a swollen brain and causes AMS, and that edema subsequently develops in those who go on to HACE. In this model, neither edema nor brain swelling would have to proceed to the point of raising intracranial pressure to produce AMS. The normal arterial pulsation in the context of a brain with nearly exhausted cranial compliance because of vasodilatation, a so-called “stiff brain,” could
transmit any movement of intracranial contents to pain-sensitive regions. Alternatively, the tight-fit hypothesis, first proposed by Ross (1985), suggests variation in cranial buffering capacity could determine susceptibility to AMS via variations in intracranial pressure. The brain of a climber with excess buffering capacity could swell, with no net effect on intracranial pressure, compared to those with limited buffering capacity, where swelling due to any cause would lead to a greater rise in intracranial pressure. No studies have yet been reported that evaluate the tight-fit hypothesis. Studies of the relationship of brain swelling to AMS, however, have revealed that all brains swell on ascent to altitude (Morocz et al., 2001), presumably from vasodilatation, irrespective of AMS. However, these MR techniques were not capable of detecting small differences that could still be clinically significant. Moreover, no studies have evaluated the anatomical or dynamic components of the tight-fit hypothesis, in spite of the availability of quantitative imaging techniques. We disagree with our colleagues’ view in the accompanying review on acute mountain sickness that available evidence is sufficient to dismiss the tight-fit hypothesis.
We suggest that a definitive link between vasogenic edema in HACE and brain swelling in AMS will require serial measurements of changes in brain volume and compliance as volunteers progress from well to AMS and will require automated brain volume software such as the SIENA program (Smith et al., 2002). Using SIENA, changes of less than 1% in global brain volume can be reliably detected.
Taken together, the available data suggest that the jury is still out regarding a pathophysiological link between AMS and HACE.
An alternative view is that headache in early AMS could be explained by trigeminal nerve pathway activation, similar to migraine. Sanchez del Rio and Moskowitz describe a model whereby neurogenic inflammation secondary to hypoxia could lead to trigeminovascular system activation and thereby to headache (Moskowitz, 1990; and Sanchez del Rio, 1999). This seems a reasonable hypothesis in light of the successful treatment and prevention
of high altitude headache by drugs with antiinflammatory actions, such as aspirin (Broome et al., 1994; Burtscher et al., 1995;
Burtscher et al., 2001), ibuprofen, and dexamethasone (Johnson et al., 1984; Ferrazzini et al., 1987; Hackett et al., 1988; Levine et al., 1989).
Studies to explore this possibility could employ advanced neuro-imaging techniques currently being used to examine the underlying pathophysiology
of migraine (Goadsby, 2002a, b).
CLINICAL COURSE AND TREATMENT
The clinical course varies with the severity of illness prior to treatment. Once coma has developed, death is more likely despite aggressive therapy (Singh et al., 1969). Whether extent of edema on MR correlates with prognosis or time to resolution is unknown; in our experience it does not, as evidenced by the Fig. 1, in which this man, with extensive edema on MRI, had an uneventful and rapid recovery. The usual course is rapid recovery if treatment is started at the first sign of HACE and slower recovery when treatment is delayed. A hospital stay of 4 to 5 days for patients that are not ambulatory is common. Average hospital stay was 5.6 days in a recent series of 9 patients, whereas average time to recovery was 2.4 weeks, ranging from 1 day to 6 weeks (Hackett et al., 1998). In a series of 44 patients with HACE from 1983, 10 recovered in 2 days or less after evacuation from high altitude, 32 were in hospital for between 3 and 14 days, and 2 remained unconscious for over 3 weeks (Dickinson,
1983). Long-term follow-up was not available. We might expect shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery, as reflected in the more recent of these series, as recognition and diagnosis are improved and evacuation becomes easier. In Nepal, for example, immediate helicopter evacuation, once an uncommon luxury, is now readily available (Graham and Basnyat, 2001).
Treatment of HACE is similar to that for other altitude illnesses, with emphasis on oxygen and descent. Simulated descent with a hyperbaric bag can also be useful, as in all altitude illness (Austin, 1998; Zafren, 1998). Compared to AMS and HAPE, most authors have noted that HACE requires a greater descent and time to recovery is longer. All agree that early treatment is the key to success. In addition to descent and oxygen, standard treatment is to give steroids in large doses, usually dexamethasone 8 to 10 mg IV, IM, or PO, followed by 4 mg every 6 h. While no controlled trials will ever be done in humans with HACE, clinical experience certainly supports the use of steroids. Controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of steroids in moderate to severe AMS and, given the presumed common pathophysiology, it is logical to use steroids in
HACE. Patients in coma require airway management and bladder drainage. Attempting to decrease intracranial pressure by intubation and hyperventilation might be a reasonable approach, but these patients already have a respiratory alkalosis, and overventilation could result in cerebral ischemia; oxygen alone markedly reduces CBF and ICP at high altitude (Hartig and Hackett, 1992). Clinicians have used loop diuretics (furosemide 40 to 80 mg or bumetanide 1 to 2 mg) to reduce brain hydration, but no controlled studies exist. Since an adequate intravascular volume to maintain perfusion pressure is critical, careful monitoring to avoid hypotension with these agents is critical. Dickinson (1981) reported that in the many HACE patients he treated with at least a single dose of intravenous furosemide, hypovolemia was never a problem. Singh et al. (1969) reported a similar experience. Hypertonic solutions of saline, mannitol, and oral glycerol have been used in the hospital setting (Houston and Dickinson, 1975; Dickinson, 1983); experience with these agents in the field is quite limited. The physiological rationale for these agents seems sound. ICP monitoring during HACE has not yet been reported. While most patients who make it to the hospital alive make a complete recovery, prolonged recovery time and presumed permanent impairment have been reported (Houston and Dickinson, 1975; Dickinson, 1983; Hackett et al., 1998). Prevention of HACE is the same as for all altitude illness: graded, reasonable rate of ascent, and, for HACE, avoidance of AMS and HAPE. At extreme altitude, onset of HACE may be abrupt, and prevention is not always possible. In recognition of this fact, many climbers are using dexamethasone on summit day for protection from HACE. While this apparently works for prevention of HACE, it has its own dangers due to the potential side effects of dexamethasone.
ILLUSTRATIVE CLINICAL EXAMPLES 臨床案例
Case 1
A 44-yr-old experienced climber–physician traveled from sea level to the high camp (5790 m) of Huyana Potosi in Bolivia in 5 days. At the refugio at 4708 m the night before, he slept poorly, but had no other symptoms of AMS. En route to high camp, he felt strong and had no pulmonary symptoms. After arrival at the high camp, he developed headache, lassitude, anorexia, mild mental confusion, and ataxia over a period of 2 h; symptoms were progressing rapidly. He took 4 mg of oral dexamethasone, which slowed but did not stop progression of symptoms; 2.5 hours later, he took another 4 mg of oral dexamethasone, felt a bit better, and slept well. In the morning, he felt
quite well, continued dexamethasone 4 mg every 6 h and was the first to the summit (6088 m). He made an uneventful descent. This case illustrates that HACE can develop abruptly and that, when used early, dexamethasone is remarkably effective. Whether continuing up while taking dexamethasone was a wise choice is arguable.
Case 2
A 50-yr-old male climber ascending Aconcagua developed headache, severe fatigue, and uncontrollable shivering at 4878 m. He also became claustrophobic in his tent. He
began to take 125 mg of acetazolamide nightly. One rest day later he was better, but only made it halfway on the ascent to Camp 2 at 5854 m due to recurrence of headache, fatigue, and cold. After another rest day at 4878 m (Camp 1), he slowly made it to Camp 2 but was again “hypothermic” on arrival. He also felt dehydrated.
He acclimatized after a rest day, but on the summit push he had headache and became ataxic and irrational at 6400 m; the guide administered balance tests, which he “failed,” and although he felt euphoric, he was guided down to high camp at 6100 m. On the descent he started crying uncontrollably, then heard birds where there were none—first small birds then hawks. A few hours after arriving at Camp 3 he recovered. However, 2 months later, he still has little memory of the events other than the
hallucinations. This example illustrates the potential difficulty of differentiating hypothermia from HACE. While both can present with ataxia and altered mental status, hallucinations, euphoria, and headache are much more likely to be due to HACE. This man did not take acetazolamide the night prior to the summit attempt. To our knowledge, no one has reported HACE in a person who was taking acetazolamide.
Case 3
A 48-yr-old European female ascended from 1500 to 5000 m in 5 days. She complained of a mild headache and had difficulty sleeping and poor appetite for 2 days prior to reaching the highest altitude. During the night at 5000 m, she became more ill, with somnolence and ataxia. In the morning she was in coma and remained so, despite a descent to 4230 m and administration of oxygen, furosemide, and steroids. Later that day she was evacuated by helicopter to hospital in Kathmandu. Her admission chest X ray was normal. She slowly regained consciousness over 3 days, was discharged 2 days later feeling mentally slow, and was amnesic for the events. This patient demonstrates a rather typical case history. Once coma has developed, response to treatment is not generally dramatic.
Case 4
A 27-yr-old male ascended from sea level to 2900 m for a ski vacation in Colorado. He developed headache, anorexia, and insomnia over the first 24 h, but skied the next day. That night, he developed a cough and was weak. The next day he was worse and stayed in the hotel. When his friends returned, they found him unconscious with gurgling respirations. He was taken to the local clinic where he was diagnosed with HAPE and HACE, and the doctor administered oxygen and dexamethasone. He started improving and was evacuated to a hospital at 1600 m. There he continued to improve. Radiograph of the chest revealed extensive pulmonary edema, and brain MRI revealed the classic increased T2-signal of the posterior corpus callosum. He was discharged 2 days later with only mild ataxia. It is common for ataxia to persist
and be the last finding to resolve. The mechanism of ataxia in HACE is unknown; perhaps it is related to cerebellar dysfunction from hypoxia rather than edema per se 為自己.
高血壓 高尿酸 慢性腎病 胰島素 https://2019medicinenote.blogspot.com/2019/12/blog-post_57.html . 糖尿病相關筆記~目錄 https://2019medicinenote.blogspot.com/2020/01/blog-post_4.html
高血壓 高尿酸 慢性腎病 胰島素 https://2019medicinenote.blogspot.com/2019/12/blog-post_57.html . 糖尿病相關筆記~目錄 https://2019medicinenote.blogspot.com/2020/01/blog-post_4.html
2019年12月18日 星期三
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
-
2024-08-12 09:20AM 前天上課時, 有學員說到高海拔肺水腫(HAPE)預防. 提到一個數字. 海拔 4000 公尺. 我又重新看了一次相關文獻. 先整理 uptodate 上面的段落 (下面是我的筆記) 1. 放慢每天上升的海拔高度. 還是預防HAPE最主要的方...
-
2023-10-25 16:08 NEJM 2001 High altitude illness 裡面沒有特別放上風險分級評估的表 NEJM 2013 Acute High Altitude Illness 下圖來自美國CDC 2024 黃皮書 下圖來自 uptodate....
-
2024-10-15 中午 11:01AM 比較必要的是丹木斯. 腸胃藥物或感冒藥物並非必備. 不過止痛藥物我覺得應該帶一些. 因為疼痛會降低行進速度. 可能會造成行程延誤. 口服類固醇也可以考慮攜帶. 外傷相關藥物(抗生素藥膏.口服抗生素)及衛材(透氣膠帶.棉棒.紗布.生理食...
沒有留言:
張貼留言